Date: 2014-04-03 11:56 pm (UTC)
wrabbit: (Default)
From: [personal profile] wrabbit
Continuation of my previous comment...

In the "Hallucinations, Monsters" case, I wouldn't feel tricked. But, say, if something were tagged "Dom/sub, top!Lee, bottom!Starbuck," and it was actually a story about dom!bottom!Starbuck and sub!top!Lee, but the author hadn't tagged dom!Starbuck or sub!Lee, I might feel misled and confused as to why they didn't tag that. I would question why they tagged who was top, but not who was dominant, and I might wonder whether they were deliberately trying to trick the reader into interpreting their tag of "top" to equal "dom."

I'm starting to think that it is useful to distinguish between when the tags reflect an obfuscation in the story itself, and when the tags obfuscate something that isn't occluded in the actual story. In the "Hallucinations, Monsters" case, the tags accurately reflect a question in the story: are the monsters hallucinations? In the "Dom/sub" case, the tags obfuscate the story and seem to mislead the reader to no purpose. The first case I think is acceptable even if it encourages the reader to make assumptions that are not ultimately true in the story, whereas the latter is confusing and deceptive.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

June 2021

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
1314 1516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 1st, 2025 01:09 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios